TY - GEN
T1 - Toward Optimal Parallel Architectures for Transtibial Prostheses
T2 - 2025 IEEE Colombian Caribbean Conference, C3 2025
AU - Baca-Rodriguez, John
AU - Barrientos-Quispe, Christian
AU - Calderon-Mendez, Piero
AU - Huaytalla-Pariona, Jaime
AU - Huamanchahua, Deyby
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 IEEE.
PY - 2025
Y1 - 2025
N2 - This work compares and analyzes three parallel mechanisms aimed at transtibial lower-limb prosthetics: 3-SPS-1-S, 3-UPU-1-S, and 3-UCU-1-S. It addresses the limitations of current serial-based prostheses, such as discomfort and restricted mobility, and explores the underutilization of parallel architectures in this field. The study focuses on forward and inverse kinematics, workspace, and singularities. Forward kinematics are solved using a hybrid method that combines the Newton-Raphson numerical approach with initial estimates generated by an artificial neural network (ANN). In contrast, inverse kinematics are approached geometrically using actuator lengths and previous positions as inputs. The selection of the 'optimal' mechanism is based on two main criteria: (i) how well the workspace matches the physiological range of the human ankle and (ii) the number and distribution of singularities in that region. Additionally, the ANN training process was adapted to each mechanism's configuration: for the 3-UPU-1-S and 3-UCU-1-S architectures, three hidden layers with 35 neurons each were used, whereas the 3-SPS-1-S mechanism required only two layers with 60 neurons each. These tailored configurations led to improved network performance for each specific mechanism. Ultimately, the mechanism with the fewest singularities and most excellent orientational coverage was identified as the most promising candidate for future prosthetic applications.
AB - This work compares and analyzes three parallel mechanisms aimed at transtibial lower-limb prosthetics: 3-SPS-1-S, 3-UPU-1-S, and 3-UCU-1-S. It addresses the limitations of current serial-based prostheses, such as discomfort and restricted mobility, and explores the underutilization of parallel architectures in this field. The study focuses on forward and inverse kinematics, workspace, and singularities. Forward kinematics are solved using a hybrid method that combines the Newton-Raphson numerical approach with initial estimates generated by an artificial neural network (ANN). In contrast, inverse kinematics are approached geometrically using actuator lengths and previous positions as inputs. The selection of the 'optimal' mechanism is based on two main criteria: (i) how well the workspace matches the physiological range of the human ankle and (ii) the number and distribution of singularities in that region. Additionally, the ANN training process was adapted to each mechanism's configuration: for the 3-UPU-1-S and 3-UCU-1-S architectures, three hidden layers with 35 neurons each were used, whereas the 3-SPS-1-S mechanism required only two layers with 60 neurons each. These tailored configurations led to improved network performance for each specific mechanism. Ultimately, the mechanism with the fewest singularities and most excellent orientational coverage was identified as the most promising candidate for future prosthetic applications.
KW - 3-SPS-1-S
KW - 3-UCU-1-S
KW - 3-UPU-1-S
KW - Newton-Raphson
KW - Parallel mechanisms
KW - transtibial prosthesis
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105033334367
U2 - 10.1109/C366505.2025.11340156
DO - 10.1109/C366505.2025.11340156
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:105033334367
T3 - C3 2025 - IEEE Colombian Caribbean Conference
BT - C3 2025 - IEEE Colombian Caribbean Conference
A2 - Gomez, Yesica Beltran
A2 - Mendoza, Paul Sanmartin
PB - Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.
Y2 - 17 September 2025 through 20 September 2025
ER -